DURING this past week I was left contemplating the meaning of the word "healing" after a patient thanked me for "healing her".
The choice of the word "healing" by my patient sounded strange and somewhat antiquated.
As is always the case when I am puzzling over words, my instinct is to reach for a dictionary so as to acquire a baseline for my thoughts.
The Oxford English Dictionary thus informed me that the word "heal" means "make or become sound or healthy again". The dictionary did not expand on the word "healer", other than to label it a noun; thus leaving me in the rather unsatisfactory situation of understanding that a healer is someone who makes something sound or healthy again. The problem with words is that the deeper you dig into them, the more complex the question becomes.
For example, if the two ends of a broken bone knit together, we would class that as healing. However, if the limb containing that bone is left misshapen and the patient has a resulting limp, can they truly be said to be "healed", "sound" or "healthy"? Furthermore, what does being "healthy" mean? Can a child with nothing more than mild arthritis, consider himself as "healthy"?
I believe that the answer to the last question is "yes"; just as I have come to the conclusion that being healed means far more than being rid of one's disease. Indeed, I have started to consider the possibility a person can be healed despite the continuing existence of what most people would consider as ill-health.
The child with an arthritic knee feels healthy because he has come to terms with the reality of living with a worn joint; he has come to consider that his disease is a normal part of him and thus, in his mind, he is healthy.
Perhaps healing is something we should be attempting more often, rather than trying to cure or just treat. We can only cure patients some of the time; but we can probably heal people on many more occasions.